- RUGER 22 SINGLE SIX REVOLVER SERIAL NUMBER SERIAL NUMBERS
- RUGER 22 SINGLE SIX REVOLVER SERIAL NUMBER SERIAL NUMBER
He left it attached to the barrel and sold them together. He realised he should have handed the receiver in. As to the Ruger Mk I, he said that the bolt and trigger mechanism broke, he was asked if he was interested in selling the parts so he dismantled it. The defendant was taken to the police station where he was interviewed and he made a number of admissions. Both were registered to the defendant but were not stored correctly. Additionally, inside the house, police found two further revolvers both of Ruger brand in a case on the floor, in the defendant’s bedroom. Inside the safe police found a large quantity of reloading propellant, later weighed at 6.5kg, the limit allowed being 5kg. This air rifle was not registered, and was not stored correctly. There was a small amount of air rifle pellets on a nearby bench. During the search the defendant directed police to an air rifle which was leaning against a wall next to a shed door. All of this gives rise to counts 1 and 3 on the indictment and two of the summary charges relating to possession and storage. As a “Category C” firearm, this was a firearm that the defendant’s licence did not allow him to have. Later investigations revealed that the firearm was stolen in 2000. The defendant admitted that it was not registered said it had belonged to his grandfather. 22 rifle that had been disassembled and stored in a length of poly-pipe that had been sealed at both ends. During the further search of the defendant’s home, police found a Browning semi-automatic.
RUGER 22 SINGLE SIX REVOLVER SERIAL NUMBER SERIAL NUMBERS
It was not registered and in any event, the serial numbers had been removed. The Smith & Wesson revolver is the subject of count 2 on the indictment, the alleged act of trafficking being the act of receiving it as a proscribed by s 110A(2)(c)(ii) of the Firearms Act. Police found a Smith & Wesson revolver that was in an open drawer, two silencers which were in one of the firearm safes, and a homemade silencer on a bench. The defendant took police to a shed at the rear of the property where he opened a number of safes for inspection. Police then obtained a search warrant for the defendant’s home. Inquiries of the previous owner revealed that the surrendered action was not part of the pistol he sold to the defendant. While processing the pistol as a surrendered firearm, police noticed a number of discrepancies in particular the serial numbers were engraved and not stamped.
RUGER 22 SINGLE SIX REVOLVER SERIAL NUMBER SERIAL NUMBER
The effect of this was that the police registration system would show the firearm with the particular serial number was surrendered when that was not in fact the case. He then went to a Police Station where he surrendered the newly engraved action, representing it to be the action from the firearm registered to him, and requesting it be destroyed. In early 2020, he had the duplicate action engraved with the same serial number as possessed by the original pistol.
Given the pistol’s state he dismantled it and sold parts. At some point between about July 2019 and January 2020, the defendant came into possession of a duplicate action for the pistol. In around August 2019 the bolt and trigger mechanism broke. All of these matters came to light following the defendant’s dealings with a Ruger Mk I pistol. There are 4 charges of failing to comply with prescribed firearm storage requirements, and one of failing to take all precautions to ensure the safe keeping of a firearm, two charges of possessing an unregistered firearm, two charges of possessing a silencer, and one each of manufacturing a silencer, failing to comply with storage requirements for ammunition, possessing a firearm with altered identification marks, altering identification marks, and carrying out a restricted activity without a permit. Some of these relate to the two firearms the subject of the indictment. I am also dealing with his pleas of guilty to 14 summary offences. They are, possess a prohibited firearm when not the holder of an appropriate licence, trafficking in firearms and possessing a stolen firearm. Mr Ralph, the defendant, has pleaded guilty to three firearms offences contained in an indictment. STATE OF TASMANIA v RIXON ELDON RALPH 16 SEPTEMBER 2021
0 kommentar(er)
